Beyond Compliance: Why Multi-Academy Trusts Must Invest in Inclusive SEND Provision
October 29, 2025
As educational equity continues to take centre stage, Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision in Multi-Academy Trusts (MATs) has become more than a statutory requirement—it’s a test of governance, financial foresight, and moral leadership.
From Legal Duty to Strategic Risk
The framework for SEND provision is comprehensive, but its implementation often falls short. The key pillars include:
- Children and Families Act 2014 (Part 3): establishes the duty to identify, assess, and support pupils with SEND through Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs).
- SEND Regulations 2014: outlines procedural rights and responsibilities around EHCPs, including appeals and personal budgets.
- SEND Code of Practice (2015, updated 2024): offers statutory guidance, emphasising co-production, graduated response, and inclusive planning.
- Equality Act 2010: requires “reasonable adjustments” and enforces the Public Sector Equality Duty to eliminate discrimination and advance equality.
- Education Act 1996 and Human Rights Act 1998: protect the right to suitable education and prevent neglect or exclusion.
Recent cases, including R (L, M and P) v Devon County Council [2022] EWHC 493 (Admin), highlight the consequences of delays or failures in EHCP delivery. While local authorities issue EHCPs, MATs are increasingly drawn into disputes over provision, accessibility, and exclusions.
Governance: Trustees as Strategic Guardians
SEND is not just an operational concern—it’s a board-level responsibility. Trustees and governors must:
- Ensure oversight of SEND outcomes, exclusions, and attainment gaps.
- Integrate SEND performance into risk registers, audits, and strategic plans.
- Provide regular training on SEND law, safeguarding, and inclusive pedagogy.
- Act in line with Charity Commission guidance (CC3 and CC30), which requires trustees to serve the best interests of all beneficiaries, including SEND pupils.
Failure to meet these expectations can amount to a breach of fiduciary duty and expose the trust to reputational and regulatory risks.
Financial Forecasting: Inclusion as Investment
True inclusion isn’t an expense—it’s an investment.
MATs that strategically embed SEND provision often see measurable returns, including:
- Fewer exclusions and tribunal costs
- Higher staff retention and morale
- Access to targeted funding such as:
- High Needs Block allocations
- DfE capital grants for SEND facilities
- Charitable funding (e.g. Esmée Fairbairn and Paul Hamlyn Foundation)
Forward-thinking MATs plan ahead with:
- Robust staffing models (qualified SENCOs, therapeutic support teams)
- Centralised SEND leadership and policy alignment across academies
- Legal risk mitigation through proactive compliance and early dispute resolution
The Bottom Line
Inclusive education is both a legal imperative and a moral obligation. For Multi-Academy Trusts, prioritising SEND isn’t just about meeting statutory duties—it’s about building a resilient, future-ready system where every child can succeed.
Energy projects succeed not just because of strong engineering or capital investment—but because the legal strategy behind them is built to anticipate risk, avoid conflict, and accelerate execution. At Kingsley Wood, we go beyond traditional advisory work. We provide strategic commercial execution, embedding conflict-avoidance mechanisms into every stage of your project lifecycle. If you’re developing, acquiring, financing, or restructuring energy assets, your legal team must keep pace with a rapidly evolving regulatory and commercial environment. That is exactly where Kingsley Wood delivers.
A clear, contractor-friendly breakdown of payment applications, notices, and deadlines — and how subcontractors can protect their cashflow under UK construction law.
In the UK M&A landscape, the rules have changed — but too many deal processes haven’t. What used to be a structured checklist has evolved into a dynamic environment shaped by regulatory intervention, valuation tension and increasing due-diligence complexity. In this market, a transaction isn’t just a sequence of steps. It’s a challenge. And closing it requires legal support built for today’s risks, not yesterday’s playbook. At Kingsley Wood, we don’t simply manage deals. We execute them — decisively, strategically, and aligned with your commercial goals.
Understanding how a well-drafted adjudication clause can protect both homeowners and contractors from costly and time-consuming disputes.
How digital transformation, data, and regulation are reshaping the rules of HealthTech mergers and acquisitions.
In the world of construction, conflict often feels inevitable. With multiple stakeholders, complex contracts, tight deadlines, and high financial stakes, even minor misunderstandings can spiral into costly disputes. At Kingsley Wood, we believe the strongest projects aren’t those that win disputes — but those that never face them in the first place. By embedding conflict-avoidance strategies into every phase of a project, you safeguard relationships, protect resources, and deliver better results for everyone involved.
When challenges arise, the right legal guidance makes all the difference. In today’s unpredictable economic climate, both businesses and individuals can find themselves facing mounting financial pressure — from cash flow issues and creditor demands to unmanageable debt obligations. The prospect of insolvency can feel overwhelming, like being caught in an unrelenting storm without a clear course forward. At Kingsley Wood, we help you steady the ship. Our team of insolvency and restructuring specialists provides clarity, direction, and tailored strategies to help you regain control and move towards recovery with confidence.
In the fast-paced world of commercial construction, disputes are almost unavoidable — whether over payments, delays, variations, or defects. To prevent these disagreements from escalating into costly and time-consuming litigation, the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the “Construction Act”) grants parties a statutory right to adjudication — a swift and effective dispute resolution process tailored to the construction industry.
Think no signature means no contract? Think again. In construction, your actions can be just as binding as your pen. Discover why starting work before signing could cost you more than you think — and what to do to stay legally protected.
A look back at our September Partners Meeting at Carter Lane — where collaboration, growth, and shared vision came together.
